CLIQUEZ ici! / CLICK Here!

Latest News

 

Updated: 17 May 2012

 

 

 Page Update Notification - CLICK!Page Update Notification

 

Disabled Veterans and Canadians tell Ottawa "Don't Appeal"

Lead Plaintiff Dennis Manuge takes message to Ottawa

VVi 17 May 2012 

 

HALIFAX , May 16, 2012 /CNW/ - Disabled Veterans and other Canadians are sending a clear message to the Government of Canada—don't appeal the Federal Court of Canada's decision that the SISIP clawback is unlawful.

On May 1, 2012, after over five years of legal struggle, the Federal Court of Canada ruled that the Government of Canada is illegally clawing back disability benefits from Canada 's disabled Veterans. The Government of Canada has until Thursday, May 31st, 2012 to appeal the decision.

"The Government of Canada has been illegally taking advantage of Canada 's disabled veterans for far too long," said Dennis Manuge, disabled Veteran and lead plaintiff for the SISIP Class Action. "It's time for the Government of Canada to do the right thing: don't appeal the Federal Court's decision and start treating Canada 's veterans with the honour and dignity they deserve."

Canadians have sent more than 2,000 letters, emails and tweets to the Government of Canada and Members of Parliament, telling them to end the SISIP Clawback and to not appeal the Federal Court of Canada's decision.

 

Manuge will be in Ottawa tomorrow, Thursday, May 17, 2012, to ensure the Government of Canada will listen to Canadians and accept the Federal Court of Canada's decision. Following Question Period, at 3:30 pm EST, Manuge will join several Members of Parliament in the lobby of the House of Commons to address media.

"For years we served on the battlefield for Canada and our fellow Canadians," said Manuge. "Canadian's are now returning the favour and taking action at www.leavenovetbehind.ca to stand up for disabled Veterans. It's now time for the Government of Canada to do the same."

About the SISIP Class Action

The Class Action was initiated in March of 2007 on behalf Dennis Manuge and all other disabled veterans whose SISIP Long Term Disability Benefits are reduced by the amount of the monthly VAC (Veterans Affairs Canada) Disability Pension they receive under the Pension Act. The Class has more than 4,500 members. For more information on the class action, please visit www.leavenovetbehind.ca or www.mcinnescooper.com.

 

http://www.newswire.ca/en/story/976015/disabled-veterans-and-canadians-tell-ottawa-don-t-appeal

 

Page top
Dennis Manuge to Ottawa on behalf of 6,000 disabled veterans

VVi 16 May 2012

Tomorrow, Thursday, May 17, 2012, representative plaintiff Dennis Manuge will travel to Ottawa on behalf of 6,000 disabled veterans to ask the Government of Canada to put an end to the SISIP Clawback and our five year legal battle. 

 
On May 1, 2012, the Federal Court of Canada ruled that the SISIP Clawback is unlawful. The Government of Canada has until Thursday, May 31st, 2012 to file its appeal. 
 
While in Ottawa, Dennis will spend most of his time at Parliament and will be in the House of Commons gallery during Question Period. We have been informed that at least one MP will once again ask the Government of Canada to not appeal the Federal Court of Canada's decision.
 
At approximately 3:30pm EST, Dennis and several Members of Parliament will take questions from media.
 
Thanks to your support, MPs have received more than 2,000 emails encouraging them not to appeal and to put an end to the SISIP Clawback.

If you haven't yet contacted your MP and are interested in doing so, please visit www.LeaveNoVetBehind.ca .
 
It is time for the Government of Canada to do the right thing and not appeal the Federal Court of Canada decision.
 
Good luck in Ottawa Dennis! 

- The SISIP Class Action Team

http://LeaveNoVetBehind.ca
http://Facebook.com/LeaveNoVetBehind

 
Page top

Veterans board trips abroad grounded

 

May 16, 2012 - 4:09am 

By MURRAY BREWSTER The Canadian Press

VVi 16 May 2012 db

OTTAWA — Veterans Affairs Minister Steven Blaney has ordered a ban on international travel for members of an arm’s-length agency that reviews the claims of veterans.

The order late Tuesday follows growing controversy over expense claims from John Larlee, chairman of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board since 2009.

The Canadian Press reported this week that Larlee took two taxpayer-funded trips to attend lectures in Britain, where his wife was also a participant.

A group representing Canada’s veterans, the Canadian Veterans Advocacy, says the trips are suspect and wants Larlee called to account before a House of Commons committee.

New Democrats went further on Tuesday and demanded he be fired.

The minister turned aside those demands, saying the board is an arm’s-length agency that is accountable for its own actions.

“We will stand by the tribunal and expect all board members to be responsible and show respect for taxpayer dollars at all times,” he told the Commons.

“I am confident this board will keep on providing good services for our veterans.”

 

Canada veteran’s ombudsman tore a strip off the agency last week, saying it failed more often than not to give former soldiers the benefit of the doubt as they appealed benefits claims and didn’t give reasons for denying claims.

NDP veterans critic Peter Stoffer reminded Blaney that he signed off for the chairman’s last trip.

A spokeswoman for the minister, Codi Taylor, confirmed the travel ban Tuesday, but could not say whether any other action was pending.

Larlee attended the Cambridge Lecture series in 2007 at his own expense. But after he was appointed chairman, he billed the federal government for his visits in 2009 and 2011, at a total cost of $7,285.97.

“That kind of money would help a lot of disabled veterans,” Stoffer said. “How does this minister allow that kind of abuse?”

Department sources say Blaney was unaware that Larlee’s wife was attending the Cambridge lecture series when he approved the travel request.

The series, attended by the elite of Canadian and British political and legal communities, focuses on international policy. with topics such as Afghanistan and the market collapse.

http://thechronicleherald.ca/canada/96711-veterans-board-trips-abroad-grounded

 

Page top

VoC  questionnaire

 

VVi 16 May 2012 sur

 

TO: ALL VETERANSOFCANADA MEMBERS
FROM: DON LEONARDO
SUBJECT: VETERANS REVIEW & APPEAL BOARD QUESTIONS

After the Parliamentary Committee for Veterans Affairs finishes their current study they will commence an inquiry into the Veterans Review & Appeal Board. I'm trying to get a jump on this subject by asking you to give your input into this most important subject to all injured veterans, past, present and future.

I have heard a few remarks but would like to hear from you directly. Some say disband the VRAB but don't give details on what would replace it or how it would be better. Some say we need more Veterans, and health care professionals sitting on this board. I read the following early this morning and it makes me think how and what veterans would they choose? (No names, no pack drill)

  •  
  • "Not taking anything away from all the great friends I have made over the years who are like a family to me. Its the Unit in general, since I became sick over a year ago and found out I was probably gonna be released I got 0% support from them. This made me realize a few things and decided it was time to find support else where if my unit wasn't going to help."

  • "I used to have to borrow a friends car, and lie to my boss just to go to my therapy. I got caught getting my meds by a CSM that will remain un-named, and he called me a coward, and told me I was a disgrace to the uniform. This was a very low time in my career, I was stuck in a job in the battalion that I hated, but I did my job the best I could, as all soldiers should do. You got to keep focused the future is all that matters. It sucks, to feel so betrayed, as simple as that."


Please click here to fill out the short questionnaire I have created. I will post the decisions of the majority of our members in the next newsletter for you to read. No names will be provided from the results.


Sincerely,
Donald Leonardo
VeteransofCanada.ca

Visit VeteransofCanada.ca - Veterans Community at: http://community.veteransofcanada.ca/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

VVi Surveys...

 

Page top
Legion Outraged Over Fees being Charged to Disabled Veterans

VVi 16 May 2012

Ottawa – It has come to The Royal Canadian Legion’s attention that some unscrupulous people are charging fees to disabled veterans to help them complete disability claims. To make matters worse they are also making arrangements to take a percentage of the disability award when it is granted.

This must stop, immediately. While veterans are free to have anyone they desire help them with disability claims, they should not be charged for this service. We are also concerned that some veterans may be uninformed about assistance that is also readily available free of charge.

The Royal Canadian Legion is well suited to help identify and complete disability claims for veterans for free. For more than 80 years, we have provided exemplary and outstanding services to our veterans, including our serving members in the CF, the RCMP and their families free of charge – and these people do not have to be Legion members.

As we prepare to commemorate the sacrifices and accomplishments our veterans made for this country during the Battle of Vimy Ridge some 95 years ago, Canadians should remember the immense debt of gratitude we still owe our veterans. Any veteran or family member can call 1-877-534-4666 or visit our website www.legion.ca for free assistance with your Veterans Affairs Canada Disability Application. It is only just that they receive this service for free.

Patricia (Pat) Varga
Dominion President
Ottawa

http://legion.ca/News/12_April02_e.cfm

 

Page top
Veterans demand explanation for review chairman's U.K. lecture junkets

By: Murray Brewster, The Canadian Press

VVi 15 May 2012 db

Minister of Veterans Affairs Steven Blaney responds to a question during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 15, 2012. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

Minister of Veterans Affairs Steven Blaney responds to a question during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 15, 2012. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick

 

OTTAWA - Veterans Affairs Minister Steven Blaney has ordered a ban on international travel for members of an arm's-length agency that reviews the claims of veterans.

The order late Tuesday follows growing controversy over expense claims from John Larlee, chairman of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board since 2009.

The Canadian Press reported this week that Larlee took two taxpayer-funded trips to attend lectures in Britain, where his wife was also a participant.

A group representing Canada's veterans, the Canadian Veterans Advocacy, says the trips are suspect and wants Larlee called to account before a House of Commons committee.

New Democrats went further on Tuesday and demanded he be fired.

The minister turned aside those demands, saying the board is an arm's-length agency that is accountable for its own actions.

"We will stand by the tribunal and expect all board members to be responsible and show respect for taxpayer dollars at all times," he told the Commons.

"I am confident this board will keep on providing good services for our veterans."

Canada veteran's ombudsman tore a strip off the agency last week, saying it failed more often than not to give former soldiers the benefit of the doubt as they appealed benefits claims and didn't give reasons for denying claims.

NDP veterans critic Peter Stoffer reminded Blaney that he signed off for the chairman's last trip.

A spokeswoman for the minister, Codi Taylor, confirmed the travel ban Tuesday, but could not say whether any other action was pending.

Larlee attended the Cambridge Lecture series in 2007 at his own expense. But after he was appointed chairman, he billed the federal government for his visits in 2009 and 2011, at a total cost of $7,285.97.

"That kind of money would help a lot of disabled veterans," Stoffer said. "How does this minister allow that kind of abuse?"

Department sources say Blaney was unaware that Larlee's wife was attending the Cambridge lecture series when he approved the travel request.

 

The series, attended by the elite of Canadian and British political and legal communities, focuses on high-level international policy, with topics such as Afghanistan and the impact of the market collapse. Larlee's wife, Justice Margaret Larlee of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal, took part in the 2007, 2009 and 2011 events.

The chairman refused an interview request, but a spokeswoman for the board said the trips received the necessary approvals and were paid for in accordance with Treasury Board guidelines.

Danielle Gauthier said the conferences helped Larlee to guide the board through tribunal administration and fell within the category of professional development. Board records show Larlee attended five other training conferences in Canada — at a total cost of $6,757.67 — since he was appointed in 2009.

Under questioning in the Commons, Blaney said he expects the board to "rigorously apply its standards and it spend taxpayers' money carefully."

Veterans groups were dismayed.

"This is very disappointing on more than one level," said Mike Blais, of Canadian Veterans Advocacy.

"On one hand, Veterans Affairs Canada is sustaining severe cuts resulting in office closures and the dismissal of hundreds of employees, many who are front-line staff, yet on the other, we have the (review board), excluded from the budgetary cuts, squandering thousands of dollars (and) sending Mr. Larlee abroad to lectures."

In light of the conference agendas, he said the trips "surely cannot be justified."

The chairman of the review and appeal board should be fired if he can't provide a suitable explanation for attending the lectures at stately Cambridge University, north of London, Blais said.

The Conservative government promised to either reform or abolish the board and it's time to do one or the other, he added.

That pledge was made during the 2005 election campaign and the Stoffer reminded the government about it only to have the minister describe the notion an "irresponsible NDP suggestion."

 

See more...

 

Page top

New virtual reality therapy could help Afghanistan veterans

CBC News

Posted: May 14, 2012 9:02 PM ET

VVi 15 May 2012 db

PTSD and virtual reality therapy

 

Effort to combat PTSD

 

CBC News has learned that the Canadian military has decided to use "virtual reality therapy" in a pilot project to treat post-traumatic stress disorder.

The new therapy method puts soldiers in a computer-animated situation that recreates the specific incident that left the soldiers traumatized. A therapist then helps the soldiers to work through their memories.

It is estimated that 17 per cent of Canadian soldiers who did dangerous patrols outside of their base in Afghanistan, and who are now home, are reporting symptoms of PTSD.

Dr. Rakesh Jetly says virtual reality therapy is a new and promising tool in the treatment of PTSD.

Dr. Rakesh Jetly says virtual reality therapy is a new and promising tool in the treatment of PTSD. (Courtesy of the Canadian Forces)

The Canadian Forces says the therapy seems to appeal to a younger generation of soldiers comfortable with video games.

The VR therapy was pioneered by Dr. Skip Rizzo at the University of Southern California. He says that “the research shows, pretty consistently over the years, that by having the person gradually imagine or be exposed in VR to events in the traumatic memories, that they’re able to process emotional memories.”

 

The Canadian Forces points out that VR therapy is only one element of exposure therapy treatments for PTSD. Other aspects include re-experiencing the trauma through journaling, describing verbally or narrating, and producing art and audiotapes.

Col. Rakesh Jetly, a Canadian Forces psychiatrist, says VR is a “new and promising tool that provides a novel alternative to exposure therapy.”

The new therapy is being used in more than 50 U.S. military hospitals.

U.S. soldier Jason Skinner has credited the video game therapy with saving him from a breakdown after serving in Iraq.

 

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2012/05/14/ptsd-therapy-dnd.html

 

Page top

14 May 2012

 

As you are aware, on May 1, 2012, Canada's disabled veterans won an important victory. But our fight for fair and just treatment is not over. The Government of Canada has a right to appeal the Federal Court's decision by May 31st. They have said that they are considering options.

Tell Ottawa to do the right thing: support Canada's veterans and don't appeal the Federal Court ruling.

There are two new ways for you to make your voice heard on leavenovetbehind.ca:

 1. Send a new email or letter to your Member of Parliament and key government officials: http://leavenovetbehind.ca/letter

 2. Contact MPs on Twitter: http://leavenovetbehind.ca/twitter

 Veterans deserve better than another five years in court. With the support of all Canadians we can help the Government of Canada make the right decision.

 We will continue to keep you posted on developments.

Forward this email to a friend.

- The SISIP Class Action Team

http://LeaveNoVetBehind.ca
http://Facebook.com/LeaveNoVetBehind

Comme vous le savez, le 1er mai 2012, les anciens combattants invalides ont remporté une importante victoire. Cependant, notre lutte pour obtenir un traitement équitable et juste n’est pas terminée. 

En effet, le gouvernement du Canada a le droit de porter en appel la décision de la Cour fédérale d’ici le 31 mai. Il a mentionné qu’il était en train d’envisager ses options

Dites à Ottawa de faire ce qui est juste, à savoir appuyer les anciens combattants du Canada et de ne pas porter en appel la décision de la Cour fédérale. 

Il existe deux nouvelles façons de vous faire entendre à leavenovetbehind.ca :

1. Envoyez un nouveau courriel ou une nouvelle lettre à votre député fédéral ou à vos principaux représentants gouvernementaux : http://leavenovetbehind.ca/letter

2. Communiquez avec votre député fédéral sur Twitter : http://leavenovetbehind.ca/twitter

Les anciens combattants méritent bien plus que cinq autres années dans les tribunaux. Grâce à l’aide des Canadiens et des Canadiennes, nous pouvons aider le gouvernement du Canada à prendre la bonne décision. 

Nous continuerons à vous tenir au courant des derniers progrès. 

- L’équipe de recours collectif RARM 

http://LeaveNoVetBehind.ca
http://Facebook.com/LeaveNoVetBehind

  

Page top

Justice Department, National Defence reviewing Federal Court’s decision on veterans

Critics say it would be ‘cruel’ if the government appeals a recent Federal Court ruling on pain and suffering payments for more than 6,000 veterans.

The Hill Times

By BEA VONGDOUANGCHANH |

Published: Monday, 05/14/2012 12:00 am EDT

VVi 14 May 2012 db

Photographs by Jake Wright, The Hill Times

It would be “cruel” and “disheartening” if the federal government appeals a Federal Court ruling stating that veterans are entitled to pain and suffering payments under the Department of National Defence’s Service Income Security Insurance Plan, say opposition critics. 

“It is unfortunate that veterans had to go to court for five years on that, but now the simple solution for the government is quite clear, stop the legal proceedings, end the charade that you can actually win this one, save the taxpayers some money through legal fees and sit down with Peter Driscoll and Dennis Manuge and the entire legal team of the veterans and come up with a compromise that will be beneficial to both sides,” NDP MP Peter Stoffer (Sackville-Eastern Shore, N.S.) told The Hill Times last week. 

More than 6,000 veterans took the federal government to court when their pain and suffering payments were clawed back through SISIP. The insurance plan pays 75 per cent of a person’s salary if they are medically discharged from the Canadian Forces, but at the same time deducts any additional payments the veteran receives for pain and suffering.

Federal Court Justice Robert Barnes ruled on May 1 that the federal government was wrong to claw back this benefit to veterans who were injured in the line of duty. The court case took five years to complete.

“This is about our dignity—yes, money is something that each of us has an amount attached to us—it’s about the dignity and knowing that when you sign on the dotted line and give service to Canada, that Canada has your back,” lead plaintiff, Mr. Manuge told Postmedia News recently.

But opposition MPs and veterans last week said they were worried that the federal government would appeal the ruling, further delaying veterans from receiving their benefits.

Mr. Stoffer, his party’s veterans critic, said the government “has a habit of delaying things” and could likely do that in this case as well. “This is cruel to say but a lot of veterans believe it—if they appeal some veterans may pass on and thus they wouldn’t get a benefit. I mean, some veterans believe that. I don’t think they can be that cruel or disheartening, but I honestly would encourage them to do the right thing,” Mr. Stoffer said. “If they appeal this decision, they’re sending a clear message to all veterans and their families 

 

that, ‘We don’t care about you, we’re going to fight you in court every step of the way.’ I don’t think any government, no matter what party you are, wants that image so I encourage Harper to do the right thing, tell his ministers to stop the appeal, give the money that they so rightfully deserve and let’s all move forward.”

Liberal MP Sean Casey (Charlottetown, P.E.I.), a lawyer and his party’s veterans critic, said the decision was a “slam dunk” one for veterans, adding that he thinks there is no reason the government should appeal it.

“I don’t understand why the federal government lawyers didn’t sit down with the plaintiffs and settle the case out of court. It was very clear in the judge’s decision that this wasn’t a close call. This was a slam dunk in favour of the veterans. So, as far as I’m concerned, the right thing to do now is to pay up and move on,” he said last week. “Reading the decision on its own, it strikes me the decision was made basically on a stated case, with an agreed statement of facts so it’s purely a question of law. So, my sense is that if they decide to appeal, it would be solely for strategic purposes not because they think they’re going to win. If they do that, that’s despicable.”

Mr. Casey asked Defence Minister Peter MacKay (Central Nova, N.S.) in Question Period whether the government would commit to not appealing the decision on May 1. At the time, Mr. MacKay said that the Justice Department and DND will review the case. “Until such time, would be inappropriate to comment further,” he said. 

Mr. MacKay’s office told The Hill Times last week that the departments are still reviewing the decision.

Mr. Stoffer said it’s important for the veterans to receive the extra money because they rely on it for prescriptions, and professional help such as physiotherapists and mental health specialists. “Don’t forget many of them have been medically released. They lost the dignity of a long-term career in the military,” he said. “This is what they did. They loved serving in the armed forces. That is now taken away because of an injury either mental or physical. Why would you then punish them even further by taking money away that’s rightfully theirs?”

Mr. Casey said that it’s time to move on. “There’s a bunch of cases that the Federal Court should be dealing with, not this one. It’s unfair to the veterans, it’s expensive for the taxpayer, it’s a waste of the court’s time. It’s time to put it behind us,” he said.

 

bvongdou@hilltimes.com

The Hill Times

See more...

 

Page top

Canadian Forces’ loyalty in jeopardy

VVi 14 May 2012

Note: VeteranVoice.info (VVi) and David Scandrett wrote into the Hill Times to have a letter to the editor published.

Please write to the Hill Times or any other newspaper urging Minister MacKay and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson to NOT appeal the Federal Court Ruling.

Remember to put “LETTER TO THE EDITOR” in the subject line and address the email to, well, “Dear Editor”

news@hilltimes.com

kmalloy@hilltimes.com

Perry Gray, Editor-in-Chief, VeteranVoice.info

 

 

Canadian Forces’ loyalty in jeopardy

The Hill Times

Published: Monday, 05/14/2012 12:00 am EDT

On May 1, 2012, the Federal Court rendered an unequivocal yet fairly worded decision that the deduction of Pension Act monthly disability payments from the Canadian Forces long-term disability policy known as SISIP (Service Income Security Insurance Plan) is not “contractually justified.” We urge Defence Minister Peter MacKay and Chief of Defence Staff Walter Natynczyk to not appeal this ruling. 

VeteranVoice.info is a community of more than 110,000 serving and former CF members as well as Canadian families and supporters of the CF community. We are the largest online, real-time news distribution and sharing community in Canada. We do not take the step to politically advocate unless the issue is of utmost importance, clarity and injustice.

What the DND Ombudsman, Yves Côté, concluded were “profoundly unfair” deductions of Pension Act payments from SISIP LTD income is a highly important, clear and indisputably unjust practice. Mr. Côté’s recommendations as well as those of his predecessor, André Marin were unanimously endorsed by the House Standing Committee on National Defence in 2003, a committee for which you were an associate member. Yet, the recommendations have never been enacted.

There is indisputably no other issue which has passed through the VeteranVoice.info community since its inception which has galvanized universal support like the call to stop the profoundly unfair deductions from SISIP LTD. This issue has become a touchstone and a banner call magnifying other less visible shortfalls and gaps which continue to affect serving and retired CF members. 

Nevertheless, we wish to thank Mr. MacKay and Gen. Natynczyk on recent actions to re-establish faith with the CF and the public. We commend them for promptly following the auditor general’s recommendations to establish a separate government panel to select Canada’s CF-18 replacement fighter. 

Following recommendations to replace the broken faith, broken bodies, and broken minds of injured CF soldiers affected by the unfair and illegal deductions from SISIP LTD should be as quickly and thoroughly acted upon as recommendations to replace a piece of inanimate equipment.

Two weeks ago, the CDS made an appeal to the Canadian public for assistance in filling the ranks of mental health workers. This is the kind of partnership and public awareness which begins to instill the necessary bond and faith between Canada and its military. Such calls also greatly assist the healing of injured CF who have become devastated by dealing with an often uncaring bureaucratic system which often worsens their conditions. This is counterproductive to military effectiveness and establishing public goodwill for the CF. 

As Mr. MacKay may well understand, the bond between a military members and their government is profound. This is why such words as social contract, social covenant and unlimited liability have been used to describe the mutual reliance, and an unswerving loyalty of CF members to their nation even when the uniform comes off. This loyalty, however, is in jeopardy. 

The Federal Court ruling clearly underlined that the deductions of Pension Act payments was a breach of contract. Whereas a social contract/covenant is often unclear as to the obligations of government to its military, an insurance contract is very clear. 

Also irrefutably clear is the ruling of the courts. If the government appeals this ruling, the harm done to the more than 1.5 million serving and retired members, and their families will be long-lasting. The public’s unprecedented and growing offence at the treatment of injured soldiers will undoubtedly increase exponentially. 

The one question remaining upon many minds both in and outside the CF: why should citizens honour a contract of unlimited liability to the Government of Canada when Canada continues to ignore government oversight bodies, both Chambers of Parliament, the Royal Canadian Legion (and other organizations) and potentially the Federal Court. 

The military and Canadians should never have to ask why citizens in uniform should honour unlimited liability. We urge the government to not appeal the Federal Court’s ruling. 

Perry Gray

Editor-in-Chief

VeteranVoice.info

Ottawa, Ont.

On behalf of VVi Board of Directors

See more...

 

Don’t appeal Federal Court ruling

The Hill Times

Published: Monday, 05/14/2012 12:00 am EDT

Re: “Federal Court rules on side of 6,000 CF members, and feds should not appeal it,” (The Hill Times, May 7, p. 19). I fully concur with Sean Bruyea’s assessment. The government should not appeal this as the optics for it will be large but ignorable. However, the cynical part of me says they will because, the Afghan War and veterans in general are being pushed to the back burner as things wind down and the story has a limited media life cycle. My family and I are affected by this decision and it is my fervent hope that the matter is resolved not just for us, but for future soldiers who subscribe to SISIP as well.

David Scandrett

Surrey, B.C.

See more...

VeteranVoice.info Board of Directors Letter to MND, see VVi Database...http://www.veteranvoice.info/db/all_records_more.asp?search_fd0=1233

 

Page top
Support our Vets. Don't Appeal SISIP LTD Class Action Decision

14 May 2012

On May 1st, 2012, the Federal Court of Canada ruled that the Government of Canada acted illegally in making deductions from veterans' long term disability benefits. In fact, the Federal Court of Canada sent a clear message: the SISIP clawback is unjust, harsh and deprives disabled Canadian Forces members of modest financial solace for their pain and suffering.

The Honourable Mr. Justice Robert Barnes, in his decision wrote the following:

" Para [63] Giving effect to the SISIP offset of Pension Act disability benefits wholly deprives disabled veterans of an important financial award intended to compensate for disabling injuries suffered in the service of Canadians. The SISIP offset effectively defeats the Parliamentary intent that is inherent in the Pension Act which is to provide modest financial solace to disabled CF members for their non-financial losses..."

"... The practical consequence of the claimed offset is to substantially reduce or to extinguish the LTD coverage promised to members of the Class by the SISIP Policy with particularly harsh effect on the most seriously disabled CF members who have been released from active service. That is an outcome that could not reasonably have been intended and I reject it unreservedly."

Thursday, May 31st, 2012, is the deadline for the Government of Canada to announce its intention of an appeal. It is time for the Government of Canada to do the right thing and not appeal the Federal Court of Canada decision.

Please support Canada 's disabled veterans.

Sincerely,

Dennis Manuge, Representative Plaintiff: Manuge Vs. Her Majesty The Queen

792 West Petpeswick Road

Musquodoboit Harbour , NS B0J 2L0

(902) 889-3230

dmanuge@eastlink.ca

 

Page top