|
Disabled
Veterans and Canadians tell
Ottawa
"Don't Appeal"
Lead Plaintiff
Dennis
Manuge takes message to Ottawa
VVi 17 May 2012
|
HALIFAX
, May 16, 2012 /CNW/ - Disabled Veterans and
other Canadians are sending a clear message to the Government
of Canada—don't appeal the Federal Court of Canada's
decision that the SISIP clawback is unlawful.
On May 1, 2012, after
over five years of legal struggle, the Federal Court of Canada
ruled that the Government of Canada is illegally clawing back
disability benefits from
Canada
's disabled Veterans. The Government of Canada has until
Thursday, May 31st, 2012 to appeal the decision.
"The Government of
Canada has been illegally taking advantage of
Canada
's disabled veterans for far too long," said
Dennis
Manuge, disabled Veteran and lead plaintiff for the SISIP
Class Action. "It's time for the Government of
Canada
to do the right thing: don't appeal the Federal Court's
decision and start treating
Canada
's veterans with the honour and dignity they deserve."
Canadians have sent more
than 2,000
letters, emails and tweets to the Government of
Canada
and Members of Parliament, telling them to end the
SISIP Clawback and to not appeal the Federal Court of Canada's
decision.
|
|
Manuge will be in
Ottawa
tomorrow, Thursday, May 17, 2012, to ensure the Government of Canada
will listen to Canadians and accept the Federal Court of Canada's
decision. Following Question Period, at 3:30 pm EST, Manuge will join
several Members of Parliament in the lobby of the House of Commons to
address media.
"For years we served on the
battlefield for
Canada
and our fellow Canadians," said Manuge. "Canadian's are now
returning the favour and taking action at www.leavenovetbehind.ca
to stand up for disabled Veterans. It's now time for the Government of
Canada to do the same."
About
the SISIP Class Action
The Class Action was initiated in
March of 2007 on behalf
Dennis
Manuge and all other disabled veterans whose SISIP Long Term Disability
Benefits are reduced by the amount of the monthly VAC (Veterans Affairs
Canada) Disability Pension they receive under the Pension Act. The Class
has more than 4,500 members. For more information on the class action,
please visit www.leavenovetbehind.ca
or www.mcinnescooper.com.
|
http://www.newswire.ca/en/story/976015/disabled-veterans-and-canadians-tell-ottawa-don-t-appeal
|
|
 Dennis Manuge
to Ottawa on
behalf of 6,000 disabled veterans
VVi 16 May 2012
Tomorrow, Thursday, May 17, 2012,
representative plaintiff Dennis Manuge will travel to Ottawa on
behalf of 6,000 disabled veterans to ask the Government of
Canada to put an end to the SISIP Clawback and our five year
legal battle.
On May 1, 2012, the Federal Court of
Canada ruled that the SISIP Clawback is unlawful. The Government
of Canada has until Thursday, May 31st, 2012 to file its appeal.
While in Ottawa, Dennis will spend
most of his time at Parliament and will be in the House of
Commons gallery during Question Period. We have been informed
that at least one MP will once again ask the Government of
Canada to not appeal the Federal Court of Canada's decision.
At approximately 3:30pm EST, Dennis
and several Members of Parliament will take questions from
media.
Thanks to your support, MPs have
received more than 2,000 emails encouraging them not to appeal
and to put an end to the SISIP Clawback.
If you haven't yet contacted your MP and are interested in doing
so, please visit www.LeaveNoVetBehind.ca
.
It is time for the Government of
Canada to do the right thing and not appeal the Federal Court of
Canada decision.
Good luck in Ottawa Dennis!
- The SISIP Class Action Team
http://LeaveNoVetBehind.ca
http://Facebook.com/LeaveNoVetBehind
|
|
May 16, 2012 - 4:09am
By MURRAY
BREWSTER The Canadian Press
VVi 16 May 2012 db
| OTTAWA — Veterans Affairs Minister
Steven Blaney has ordered a ban on international travel for
members of an arm’s-length agency that reviews the claims of
veterans.
The order late Tuesday follows
growing controversy over expense claims from John Larlee,
chairman of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board since 2009.
The Canadian Press reported
this week that Larlee took two taxpayer-funded trips to attend
lectures in Britain, where his wife was also a participant.
A group representing Canada’s
veterans, the Canadian Veterans Advocacy, says the trips are
suspect and wants Larlee called to account before a House of
Commons committee.
New Democrats went further on
Tuesday and demanded he be fired.
The minister turned aside those
demands, saying the board is an arm’s-length agency that is
accountable for its own actions.
“We will stand by the
tribunal and expect all board members to be responsible and
show respect for taxpayer dollars at all times,” he told the
Commons.
“I am confident this board
will keep on providing good services for our veterans.”
|
|
Canada veteran’s ombudsman tore a strip off the agency
last week, saying it failed more often than not to give former soldiers
the benefit of the doubt as they appealed benefits claims and didn’t
give reasons for denying claims.
NDP veterans critic Peter Stoffer
reminded Blaney that he signed off for the chairman’s last trip.
A spokeswoman for the minister, Codi
Taylor, confirmed the travel ban Tuesday, but could not say whether any
other action was pending.
Larlee attended the Cambridge Lecture
series in 2007 at his own expense. But after he was appointed chairman,
he billed the federal government for his visits in 2009 and 2011, at a
total cost of $7,285.97.
“That kind of money would help a lot of
disabled veterans,” Stoffer said. “How does this minister allow that
kind of abuse?”
Department sources say Blaney was unaware
that Larlee’s wife was attending the Cambridge lecture series when he
approved the travel request.
The series, attended by the elite of
Canadian and British political and legal communities, focuses on
international policy. with topics such as Afghanistan and the market
collapse.
|
http://thechronicleherald.ca/canada/96711-veterans-board-trips-abroad-grounded
|
|
|
VoC questionnaire
VVi 16 May 2012 sur
|
TO: ALL
VETERANSOFCANADA MEMBERS
FROM: DON LEONARDO
SUBJECT:
VETERANS REVIEW & APPEAL BOARD
QUESTIONS
After the
Parliamentary Committee for Veterans Affairs finishes
their current study they will commence an inquiry into the
Veterans Review & Appeal Board. I'm trying to get a
jump on this subject by asking you to give your input into
this most important subject to all injured veterans, past,
present and future.
I have heard a
few remarks but would like to hear from you directly. Some
say disband the VRAB but don't give details on what would
replace it or how it would be better. Some say we need
more Veterans, and health care professionals sitting on
this board. I read the following early this morning and it
makes me think how and what veterans would they
choose?
(No names, no pack drill)
-
- "Not taking
anything away from all the great friends I have made
over the years who are like a family to me. Its the
Unit in general, since I became sick over a year ago
and found out I was probably gonna be released I got
0% support from them. This made me realize a few
things and decided it was time to find support else
where if my unit wasn't going to help."
- "I used to have to
borrow a friends car, and lie to my boss just to go to
my therapy. I got caught getting my meds by a CSM that
will remain un-named, and he called me a coward, and
told me I was a disgrace to the uniform. This was a
very low time in my career, I was stuck in a job in
the battalion that I hated, but I did my job the best
I could, as all soldiers should do. You got to keep
focused the future is all that matters. It sucks, to
feel so betrayed, as simple as that."
Please click
here to fill out the short questionnaire I have
created. I will post the decisions of the majority of our
members in the next newsletter for you to read. No names
will be provided from the results.
Sincerely,
Donald Leonardo
VeteransofCanada.ca
|
Visit VeteransofCanada.ca -
Veterans Community at: http://community.veteransofcanada.ca/?xg_source=msg_mes_network
VVi Surveys...
|
|
Legion
Outraged Over Fees being Charged to Disabled Veterans
VVi 16 May 2012
Ottawa – It has come to
The Royal Canadian Legion’s attention that some unscrupulous
people are charging fees to disabled veterans to help them
complete disability claims. To make matters worse they are also
making arrangements to take a percentage of the disability award
when it is granted.
This must stop,
immediately. While veterans are free to have anyone they desire
help them with disability claims, they should not be charged for
this service. We are also concerned that some veterans may be
uninformed about assistance that is also readily available free of
charge.
The Royal Canadian Legion
is well suited to help identify and complete disability claims for
veterans for free. For more than 80 years, we have provided
exemplary and outstanding services to our veterans, including our
serving members in the CF, the RCMP and their families free of
charge – and these people do not have to be Legion members.
As we prepare to
commemorate the sacrifices and accomplishments our veterans made
for this country during the Battle of Vimy Ridge some 95 years
ago, Canadians should remember the immense debt of gratitude we
still owe our veterans. Any veteran or family member can call
1-877-534-4666 or visit our website www.legion.ca for
free assistance with your Veterans Affairs Canada Disability
Application. It is only just that they receive this service for
free.
Patricia (Pat) Varga
Dominion President
Ottawa
http://legion.ca/News/12_April02_e.cfm
|
|
Veterans
demand explanation for review chairman's U.K. lecture junkets
By: Murray Brewster, The
Canadian Press
VVi 15 May 2012 db

Minister of Veterans Affairs Steven Blaney
responds to a question during Question Period in the House
of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 15,
2012. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
| OTTAWA - Veterans Affairs Minister
Steven Blaney has ordered a ban on international travel for
members of an arm's-length agency that reviews the claims of
veterans.
The order late Tuesday follows
growing controversy over expense claims from John Larlee,
chairman of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board since 2009.
The Canadian Press reported
this week that Larlee took two taxpayer-funded trips to attend
lectures in Britain, where his wife was also a participant.
A group representing Canada's
veterans, the Canadian Veterans Advocacy, says the trips are
suspect and wants Larlee called to account before a House of
Commons committee.
New Democrats went further on
Tuesday and demanded he be fired.
The minister turned aside those
demands, saying the board is an arm's-length agency that is
accountable for its own actions.
"We will stand by the
tribunal and expect all board members to be responsible and
show respect for taxpayer dollars at all times," he told
the Commons.
"I am confident this board
will keep on providing good services for our veterans."
Canada veteran's ombudsman tore
a strip off the agency last week, saying it failed more often
than not to give former soldiers the benefit of the doubt as
they appealed benefits claims and didn't give reasons for
denying claims.
NDP veterans critic Peter
Stoffer reminded Blaney that he signed off for the chairman's
last trip.
A spokeswoman for the minister,
Codi Taylor, confirmed the travel ban Tuesday, but could not
say whether any other action was pending.
Larlee attended the Cambridge
Lecture series in 2007 at his own expense. But after he was
appointed chairman, he billed the federal government for his
visits in 2009 and 2011, at a total cost of $7,285.97.
"That kind of money would
help a lot of disabled veterans," Stoffer said. "How
does this minister allow that kind of abuse?"
Department sources say Blaney
was unaware that Larlee's wife was attending the Cambridge
lecture series when he approved the travel request.
|
|
The series, attended by the elite of Canadian and British
political and legal communities, focuses on high-level international
policy, with topics such as Afghanistan and the impact of the market
collapse. Larlee's wife, Justice Margaret Larlee of the New Brunswick
Court of Appeal, took part in the 2007, 2009 and 2011 events.
The chairman refused an interview
request, but a spokeswoman for the board said the trips received the
necessary approvals and were paid for in accordance with Treasury Board
guidelines.
Danielle Gauthier said the conferences
helped Larlee to guide the board through tribunal administration and
fell within the category of professional development. Board records show
Larlee attended five other training conferences in Canada — at a total
cost of $6,757.67 — since he was appointed in 2009.
Under questioning in the Commons, Blaney
said he expects the board to "rigorously apply its standards and it
spend taxpayers' money carefully."
Veterans groups were dismayed.
"This is very disappointing on more
than one level," said Mike Blais, of Canadian Veterans Advocacy.
"On one hand, Veterans Affairs
Canada is sustaining severe cuts resulting in office closures and the
dismissal of hundreds of employees, many who are front-line staff, yet
on the other, we have the (review board), excluded from the budgetary
cuts, squandering thousands of dollars (and) sending Mr. Larlee abroad
to lectures."
In light of the conference agendas, he
said the trips "surely cannot be justified."
The chairman of the review and appeal
board should be fired if he can't provide a suitable explanation for
attending the lectures at stately Cambridge University, north of London,
Blais said.
The Conservative government promised to
either reform or abolish the board and it's time to do one or the other,
he added.
That pledge was made during the 2005
election campaign and the Stoffer reminded the government about it only
to have the minister describe the notion an "irresponsible NDP
suggestion."
|
See more...
|
|
New virtual reality therapy could help
Afghanistan veterans
CBC News
Posted: May 14, 2012 9:02 PM ET
VVi 15 May 2012 db
Effort to combat PTSD
|
CBC News has learned that the
Canadian military has decided to use "virtual reality
therapy" in a pilot project to treat post-traumatic
stress disorder.
The new therapy method puts
soldiers in a computer-animated situation that recreates the
specific incident that left the soldiers traumatized. A
therapist then helps the soldiers to work through their
memories.
It is estimated that 17 per
cent of Canadian soldiers who did dangerous patrols outside of
their base in Afghanistan, and who are now home, are reporting
symptoms of PTSD.
Dr. Rakesh Jetly says virtual reality therapy is a
new and promising tool in the treatment of PTSD. (Courtesy of
the Canadian Forces)
The Canadian Forces says the
therapy seems to appeal to a younger generation of soldiers
comfortable with video games.
The VR therapy was pioneered by
Dr. Skip Rizzo at the University of Southern California. He
says that “the research shows, pretty consistently over the
years, that by having the person gradually imagine or be
exposed in VR to events in the traumatic memories, that
they’re able to process emotional memories.”
|
|
The Canadian Forces points out that VR
therapy is only one element of exposure therapy treatments for PTSD.
Other aspects include re-experiencing the trauma through journaling,
describing verbally or narrating, and producing art and audiotapes.
Col. Rakesh Jetly, a Canadian Forces
psychiatrist, says VR is a “new and promising tool that provides a
novel alternative to exposure therapy.”
The new therapy is being used in more
than 50 U.S. military hospitals.
U.S. soldier Jason Skinner has credited
the video game therapy with saving him from a breakdown after serving in
Iraq.
|
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2012/05/14/ptsd-therapy-dnd.html
|
|

14 May 2012
|
As you are aware, on May 1, 2012, Canada's
disabled veterans won an important victory. But our fight for
fair and just treatment is not over. The Government of Canada
has a right to appeal the Federal Court's decision by May
31st. They have said that they are considering options.
Tell Ottawa to do the right thing: support
Canada's veterans and don't appeal the Federal Court ruling.
There are two new ways for you to make your
voice heard on leavenovetbehind.ca:
1. Send a new email or letter to your Member
of Parliament and key government officials:
http://leavenovetbehind.ca/letter
2. Contact MPs on Twitter:
http://leavenovetbehind.ca/twitter
Veterans deserve better than another five
years in court. With the support of all Canadians we can
help the Government of Canada make the right decision.
We will continue to keep you posted on
developments.
Forward this email to a friend.
- The SISIP Class Action Team
http://LeaveNoVetBehind.ca
http://Facebook.com/LeaveNoVetBehind |
|
Comme vous le savez, le 1er mai 2012, les anciens
combattants invalides ont remporté une importante victoire. Cependant,
notre lutte pour obtenir un traitement équitable et juste n’est pas
terminée.
En effet, le gouvernement du Canada a le droit de
porter en appel la décision de la Cour fédérale d’ici le 31 mai.
Il a mentionné qu’il était en train d’envisager ses options
Dites à Ottawa de faire ce qui est juste, à savoir
appuyer les anciens combattants du Canada et de ne pas porter en appel
la décision de la Cour fédérale.
Il existe deux nouvelles façons de vous faire
entendre à leavenovetbehind.ca :
1. Envoyez un nouveau courriel ou une nouvelle lettre
à votre député fédéral ou à vos principaux représentants
gouvernementaux : http://leavenovetbehind.ca/letter
2. Communiquez avec votre député fédéral sur
Twitter : http://leavenovetbehind.ca/twitter
Les anciens combattants méritent bien plus que cinq
autres années dans les tribunaux. Grâce à l’aide des Canadiens et
des Canadiennes, nous pouvons aider le gouvernement du Canada à
prendre la bonne décision.
Nous continuerons à vous tenir au courant des
derniers progrès.
- L’équipe de recours collectif RARM
http://LeaveNoVetBehind.ca
http://Facebook.com/LeaveNoVetBehind
|
|
|
Justice
Department, National Defence reviewing Federal Court’s
decision on veterans
Critics say it would be ‘cruel’ if
the government appeals a recent Federal Court ruling on pain and
suffering payments for more than 6,000 veterans.
The Hill Times
By BEA
VONGDOUANGCHANH |
Published: Monday,
05/14/2012 12:00 am EDT
VVi 14 May 2012 db
Photographs
by Jake Wright, The Hill Times
|
It would be “cruel”
and “disheartening” if the federal government appeals a
Federal Court ruling stating that veterans are entitled to
pain and suffering payments under the Department of National
Defence’s Service Income Security Insurance Plan, say
opposition critics.
“It is unfortunate that
veterans had to go to court for five years on that, but now
the simple solution for the government is quite clear, stop
the legal proceedings, end the charade that you can actually
win this one, save the taxpayers some money through legal fees
and sit down with Peter Driscoll and Dennis Manuge and the
entire legal team of the veterans and come up with a
compromise that will be beneficial to both sides,” NDP MP
Peter Stoffer (Sackville-Eastern Shore, N.S.) told The Hill
Times last week.
More than 6,000 veterans
took the federal government to court when their pain and
suffering payments were clawed back through SISIP. The
insurance plan pays 75 per cent of a person’s salary if they
are medically discharged from the Canadian Forces, but at the
same time deducts any additional payments the veteran receives
for pain and suffering.
Federal Court Justice
Robert Barnes ruled on May 1 that the federal government was
wrong to claw back this benefit to veterans who were injured
in the line of duty. The court case took five years to
complete.
“This is about our
dignity—yes, money is something that each of us has an
amount attached to us—it’s about the dignity and knowing
that when you sign on the dotted line and give service to
Canada, that Canada has your back,” lead plaintiff, Mr.
Manuge told Postmedia News recently.
But opposition MPs and
veterans last week said they were worried that the federal
government would appeal the ruling, further delaying veterans
from receiving their benefits.
Mr. Stoffer, his party’s
veterans critic, said the government “has a habit of
delaying things” and could likely do that in this case as
well. “This is cruel to say but a lot of veterans believe
it—if they appeal some veterans may pass on and thus they
wouldn’t get a benefit. I mean, some veterans believe that.
I don’t think they can be that cruel or disheartening, but I
honestly would encourage them to do the right thing,” Mr.
Stoffer said. “If they appeal this decision, they’re
sending a clear message to all veterans and their
families
|
|
that,
‘We don’t care about you, we’re going to fight you in court every
step of the way.’ I don’t think any government, no matter what party
you are, wants that image so I encourage Harper to do the right thing,
tell his ministers to stop the appeal, give the money that they so
rightfully deserve and let’s all move forward.”
Liberal
MP Sean Casey (Charlottetown, P.E.I.), a lawyer and his party’s
veterans critic, said the decision was a “slam dunk” one for
veterans, adding that he thinks there is no reason the government should
appeal it.
“I
don’t understand why the federal government lawyers didn’t sit down
with the plaintiffs and settle the case out of court. It was very clear
in the judge’s decision that this wasn’t a close call. This was a
slam dunk in favour of the veterans. So, as far as I’m concerned, the
right thing to do now is to pay up and move on,” he said last week.
“Reading the decision on its own, it strikes me the decision was made
basically on a stated case, with an agreed statement of facts so it’s
purely a question of law. So, my sense is that if they decide to appeal,
it would be solely for strategic purposes not because they think
they’re going to win. If they do that, that’s despicable.”
Mr.
Casey asked Defence Minister Peter MacKay (Central Nova, N.S.) in
Question Period whether the government would commit to not appealing the
decision on May 1. At the time, Mr. MacKay said that the Justice
Department and DND will review the case. “Until such time, would be
inappropriate to comment further,” he said.
Mr.
MacKay’s office told The Hill Times last week that the departments are
still reviewing the decision.
Mr.
Stoffer said it’s important for the veterans to receive the extra
money because they rely on it for prescriptions, and professional help
such as physiotherapists and mental health specialists. “Don’t
forget many of them have been medically released. They lost the dignity
of a long-term career in the military,” he said. “This is what they
did. They loved serving in the armed forces. That is now taken away
because of an injury either mental or physical. Why would you then
punish them even further by taking money away that’s rightfully
theirs?”
Mr.
Casey said that it’s time to move on. “There’s a bunch of cases
that the Federal Court should be dealing with, not this one. It’s
unfair to the veterans, it’s expensive for the taxpayer, it’s a
waste of the court’s time. It’s time to put it behind us,” he
said.
|
bvongdou@hilltimes.com
The
Hill Times
See
more...
|
|
|
 Canadian
Forces’ loyalty in jeopardy
VVi 14 May 2012
Note:
VeteranVoice.info (VVi) and David Scandrett wrote into the Hill
Times to have a letter to the editor published.
Please write
to the Hill Times or any other newspaper urging Minister MacKay
and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson to NOT appeal the Federal Court
Ruling.
Remember to put “LETTER TO THE EDITOR” in the subject line and
address the email to, well, “Dear Editor”
news@hilltimes.com
kmalloy@hilltimes.com
Perry Gray, Editor-in-Chief, VeteranVoice.info
|
Canadian Forces’ loyalty in jeopardy
The Hill Times
Published: Monday, 05/14/2012 12:00 am
EDT
On May 1, 2012, the Federal Court
rendered an unequivocal yet fairly worded decision that the
deduction of Pension Act monthly disability payments from the
Canadian Forces long-term disability policy known as SISIP
(Service Income Security Insurance Plan) is not
“contractually justified.” We urge Defence Minister Peter
MacKay and Chief of Defence Staff Walter Natynczyk to not
appeal this ruling.
VeteranVoice.info is a community of more
than 110,000 serving and former CF members as well as Canadian
families and supporters of the CF community. We are the
largest online, real-time news distribution and sharing
community in Canada. We do not take the step to politically
advocate unless the issue is of utmost importance, clarity and
injustice.
What the DND Ombudsman, Yves Côté,
concluded were “profoundly unfair” deductions of Pension
Act payments from SISIP LTD income is a highly important,
clear and indisputably unjust practice. Mr. Côté’s
recommendations as well as those of his predecessor, André
Marin were unanimously endorsed by the House Standing
Committee on National Defence in 2003, a committee for which
you were an associate member. Yet, the recommendations have
never been enacted.
There is indisputably no other issue
which has passed through the VeteranVoice.info community since
its inception which has galvanized universal support like the
call to stop the profoundly unfair deductions from SISIP LTD.
This issue has become a touchstone and a banner call
magnifying other less visible shortfalls and gaps which
continue to affect serving and retired CF members.
Nevertheless, we wish to thank Mr.
MacKay and Gen. Natynczyk on recent actions to re-establish
faith with the CF and the public. We commend them for promptly
following the auditor general’s recommendations to establish
a separate government panel to select Canada’s CF-18
replacement fighter.
Following recommendations to replace the
broken faith, broken bodies, and broken minds of injured CF
soldiers affected by the unfair and illegal deductions from
SISIP LTD should be as quickly and thoroughly acted upon as
recommendations to replace a piece of inanimate equipment.
Two weeks ago, the CDS made an appeal to
the Canadian public for assistance in filling the ranks of
mental health workers. This is the kind of partnership and
public awareness which begins to instill the necessary bond
and faith between Canada and its military. Such calls also
greatly assist the healing of injured CF who have become
devastated by dealing with an often uncaring bureaucratic
system which often worsens their conditions. This is
counterproductive to military effectiveness and establishing
public goodwill for the CF.
As Mr. MacKay may well understand, the
bond between a military members and their government is
profound. This is why such words as social contract, social
covenant and unlimited liability have been used to describe
the mutual reliance, and an unswerving loyalty of CF members
to their nation even when the uniform comes off. This loyalty,
however, is in jeopardy.
The Federal Court ruling clearly
underlined that the deductions of Pension Act payments was a
breach of contract. Whereas a social contract/covenant is
often unclear as to the obligations of government to its
military, an insurance contract is very clear.
Also irrefutably clear is the ruling of
the courts. If the government appeals this ruling, the harm
done to the more than 1.5 million serving and retired members,
and their families will be long-lasting. The public’s
unprecedented and growing offence at the treatment of injured
soldiers will undoubtedly increase exponentially.
The one question remaining upon many
minds both in and outside the CF: why should citizens honour a
contract of unlimited liability to the Government of Canada
when Canada continues to ignore government oversight bodies,
both Chambers of Parliament, the Royal Canadian Legion (and
other organizations) and potentially the Federal Court.
The military and Canadians should never
have to ask why citizens in uniform should honour unlimited
liability. We urge the government to not appeal the Federal
Court’s ruling.
Perry Gray
Editor-in-Chief
VeteranVoice.info
Ottawa, Ont.
On behalf of VVi Board of
Directors
See more...
|
|
Don’t appeal Federal Court
ruling
The Hill Times
Published: Monday, 05/14/2012 12:00
am EDT
Re:
“Federal Court rules on side of 6,000 CF members, and feds should not
appeal it,” (The Hill Times, May 7, p. 19). I fully concur with Sean
Bruyea’s assessment. The government should not appeal this as the
optics for it will be large but ignorable. However, the cynical part of
me says they will because, the Afghan War and veterans in general are
being pushed to the back burner as things wind down and the story has a
limited media life cycle. My family and I are affected by this decision
and it is my fervent hope that the matter is resolved not just for us,
but for future soldiers who subscribe to SISIP as well.
David
Scandrett
Surrey,
B.C.
See more... |
VeteranVoice.info Board of
Directors Letter to MND, see VVi
Database...http://www.veteranvoice.info/db/all_records_more.asp?search_fd0=1233
|
|
Support
our Vets. Don't Appeal SISIP LTD Class Action Decision
14 May 2012
On May 1st, 2012,
the Federal Court of Canada ruled that the Government of Canada
acted illegally in making deductions from veterans' long term
disability benefits. In fact, the Federal Court of Canada sent a
clear message: the SISIP clawback is unjust, harsh and deprives
disabled Canadian Forces members of modest financial solace for
their pain and suffering.
The Honourable Mr.
Justice Robert Barnes, in his decision wrote the following:
"
Para
[63] Giving effect to the SISIP offset of Pension Act disability
benefits wholly deprives disabled veterans of an important
financial award intended to compensate for disabling injuries
suffered in the service of Canadians. The SISIP offset effectively
defeats the Parliamentary intent that is inherent in the Pension
Act which is to provide modest financial solace to disabled CF
members for their non-financial losses..."
"... The
practical consequence of the claimed offset is to substantially
reduce or to extinguish the LTD coverage promised to members of
the Class by the SISIP Policy with particularly harsh effect on
the most seriously disabled CF members who have been released from
active service. That is an outcome that could not reasonably have
been intended and I reject it unreservedly."
Thursday, May 31st,
2012, is the deadline for the Government of Canada to announce its
intention of an appeal. It is time for the Government of Canada to
do the right thing and not appeal the Federal Court of Canada
decision.
Please support
Canada
's disabled veterans.
Sincerely,
Dennis
Manuge, Representative Plaintiff: Manuge Vs. Her Majesty The Queen
792 West Petpeswick Road
Musquodoboit Harbour
,
NS
B0J 2L0
(902) 889-3230
dmanuge@eastlink.ca
|
|
|